The only way for an American living outside of the US to stop having their income taxed by the US government is to give up their citizenship (as long as they have citizenship of another country beforehand).
The parenthetical is irrelevant. It is closer to relevant if "give up" was "renounce" as the paperwork for renouncing should be rejected if the applicant is not a dual citizen, but if you give up your citizenship, you don't have to have citizenship elsewhere.
It's complicated.
I didn't say it was.
Technically correct. You didn't say anything. You simply complained. So no critique of your comment would be valid.
Their job is to give direction,
The job of the CEO is not to micro-manage. In a crisis, if they need to personally "give direction", then the company is either 5 person, or the CEO is incompetent.
From your response I gather you've not seen what the C-level executives do in a high profile emergency, and it doesn't get more high profile than your entire IT infrastructure collapsing.
I've been there for that. The CIO was in every meeting, and asked few questions, and gave exactly zero direction. The CEO drove in after hours, and literally hid in his office, waiting for the CIO to update him, and I only knew he was there because he came down and shook hands after the issue was resolved.
POS bug took out all credit card machines at a large retailer (coincidentally, it happened at closing, so the last 30 minutes, the slow time, the manual process was used), estimated loss was in the millions if the bug wasn't found and eliminated. The manual process isn't as fast or as fraud resistant, and people simply abandon purchases if the line is too long (fraud is unquantifiable, the incidence is small now, as the protections are good, but if people learned the system was down, expect the fraudsters to show up).
And the time it took to identify the bug, confirm it with the POS vendor, and implement a work around, the CEO was not there, and didn't give a single order in person, and the CIO didn't give a single order either. Though I expect one or the other would, if we weren't handling the issue as best we could, for a problem caused by a 3rd party we were making work until they could get us a firmware update to fix the underlying issue.
it's a fully confirmed fact.
It's a fully confirmed fact that "admin" outsourcers can do it, not that Huawei did anything to make themselves special, or that Huawei is doing it. If the Dutch company switched to a Dutch outsourcer and gave them root, the result would be the same, just not Chinese, so no outrage from the racists.
A LISP programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing. -- Alan Perlis